Skip to main content

AI Muddies the Waters of Academic Integrity


I've been taking online classes to keep my mind sharp and to stave off academic boredom (If I accidentally get a degree in health science along the way, that's just a bonus). I started this journey rashly a short time before the onset of personal AI. The decision to sign up was fueled by impulsivity and a feeling of uncertainty that had set in when I found out I wouldn't be able to continue in-person classes to further my Nursing certification from LPN to RN.

I had run out of funding, but a new tuition-free university (University of the People) had found me. It had been drawn out of the ether of the internet by my nebulous, data-driven, targeted ads. It presented itself as an escape from ineptitude. It offered me a beautiful opportunity to slake my unquenchable thirst for learning without a hefty price tag. The experience was wonderful until AI reared its head from the dark waters of the internet.

It happened behind me, unassuming and hardly noticed. In the beginning, it was small. It evolved from finishing a sentence to formulating its own, which was hardly scary, but once it had dragged itself from the primordial goo of swirling data, its mastery grew from grade school level to high school to college-level writing. The rate of its progression was exponential.

It was at this time, once it had outpaced my peers on the form and function of writing, that they allowed it to replace them. It left its signature hidden in the work they claimed was theirs, as verbose politeness, glaring em dashes, and the suspicious lack of quotes from sources. Peer reviewing became unimaginably boring and pointless for those of us who bothered to put our mental pens to digital paper.

And even worse, the old digital tools we had grown to love are now digital traps for a student with a professor who scans for AI. Tools like Grammarly will now poison your writing if you take their style and clarity suggestions, and even if you write just a little too properly, your writing might still get flagged. Sly students take AI content and inject human flair to outwit the detectors. Talented but nervous students degrade their writing to avoid being falsely accused.

As a tool, AI has so much potential, but in a fast-paced society where the attention span is null, it's becoming a corrupting force. Students have always found ways to cheat and plagiarize, but in the gray and murky waters of AI, the lines are blurred. It's becoming a crutch that atrophies young minds. Hopefully this is all just a passing season marked by growing pains. Hopefully human curiosity and the drive to learn will win in the end... It has to.


A complete and portable library. May counter brainrot 🧠. 


Affiliate Disclaimer: Some links are affiliate links. I may earn a small commission if you make a purchase, at no extra cost to you. Thanks for supporting my work!




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A loveable, Yet Murderous Android

It's been a while since a TV show, and now a book has piqued my interest. I missed the feeling of being totally drawn into a piece of media, but then Murderbot on Apple TV got its hooks into me. Murderbot TV Series  I might be a little late to the party, but I came across a YouTube short of the series that had left me wondering what would happen next. The short didn't have a title, but a quick Google Lens search led me to Apple TV. My sister visited shortly after, and we watched the entire series in one night. Even as midnight rolled around, we both agreed to just one episode. Another would end, and yet again we decided to watch just one more, until, in the wee hours of the morning, the series was completed. The obvious next step was to find out when the next season would be out. Watch official trailer here.  I didn't find the answer to that question, but I did find out that the series that had me hooked was based on a book, and there were eight of ...

Revisiting Adrian Tchaikovsky's Children of Time

It's been almost four years since I read Adrian Tchaikovsky's gem,  Children of Time but I feel the need to revisit it. I found it shortly after tackling the sci-fi classic  Dune . Unlike Dune there's no desert mystique, no magic dust that enhances your senses, and no Messianic figure; but there is the same gravity of time. Both contain worlds that feel ancient. Each gives me the distinct feel that the universe within each cover has always existed and would continue to exist long after the back cover closes for the last time in hand. A feeling that I credit to each author's intense world building.  In   Children of Time , the Messianic figure is replaced with a scientist,  Dr .  Avrana Kern,  that fancies herself a creator god with an old testament wrath against humanity's imperfections but in her cryogenic absence, her best laid plans go awry. Her gene editing viruses choose the wrong target and accelerated evolution does the rest. Time...